Topic : Governmental policies | Bài mẫu IELTS Writing
In today’s world, private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
|
Introduction |
|
|
Body 1 |
Có hai lợi ích khi các công ty đầu tư và thực hiện việc nghiên cứu khoa học
|
|
Body 2 |
Có hai bất lợi khi các công ty đầu tư và thực hiện việc nghiên cứu khoa học
|
|
Conclusion |
Paraphrase lại Thesis Statement và nêu lại quan điểm. |
Nowadays, most scientific studies are financed and carried out by private enterprises instead of the governing bodies. In my opinion, the benefits of this are greater than its drawbacks.
On the one hand, that research is paid and conducted by private companies can be greatly beneficial. In fact, unlike governmental organizations, most companies’ primary objectives are profits, so their motivation to minimize the costs arising upon research activities is much more considerable. Therefore, they tend to prevent their scientists and other workers more strictly from wasting any resources, including time and money; as a result, their outcomes can be quicker and more money-efficient. In addition, when the government leaves scientific research for businesses, the financial pressure on the national budget can be partly relieved. Instead, it can be allocated for investing in other important sectors such as education or transportation.
On the other hand, I believe that letting private businesses sponsor or undertake such studies will bring about more significant disadvantages. First, there are very few private companies that are willing to do unpaid work while shouldering a huge financial burden at the same time. Consequently, they may require the public to pay to access or share their research results, so that they can afford to cover their expenses as well as to ensure their personal incomes. Second, when allowing companies to do scientific research, the authorities can hardly make sure the entire research process is under supervision. It is possible that companies with the top priority being maximizing profits will sell their research to other organizations, such as terrorists or criminals, who take advantage of such research to harm society.
In conclusion, I claim that private investment in and conduct of scientific research may result in several advantages which are, however, outweighed by the undesirable consequences.
Recently, most of reserach activity has been funded and operated by private companies. Although the process may consume an effective amount of time, it actually can restrain the knowledge and information delivery. Considering those points, I do believe that the disadvantage outweighs the advantage.
The authority of private sector to fund and conduct research resulting in a time efficiency. Notably, it is because researchers do not have to deal with a complicated bureaucracy to do their research activity. From my undergraduate experiences, the amount of time for the private companies to accept my funding proposal for research, alongside with the compeletion of activity only took less than two month because they deem to briefly acknowledge the research findings, while in the same case, it can took more than five months with the government-affiliated companies, since they are thoroughly examine the research process. Nevertheless, since the government already issued specialised regulations to overcome this problem, I believe it will no longer important.
On the other hand, the domination from private companies in scientific scrutiny potentially restrain the delivery of knowledge and useful information. It is because the majority of them will keep the research findings for their own purposes rather than public, resulting in a potential knowledge discrepancy. Take, for example, the cutting-edge research about hybrid vehicles from Bakrie Research Institute that remain disclosed and confidential from public access because their affiliated funding company impose them to not share the results. Thus, I think that drawback can cause a great concern, as it brings inequality in getting novel knowledge and information.
In conclusion, notwithstanding with the fact that private companies can be efficient in time, I think the disadvantages still cause a great significane than that benefit because it can limit the public consumption on knowledge and helfpul information.
There is a controversial perspective heating a debate over the fact that private entities sponsor and implement more scientific research than the government. This reality has both pros and cons, however, I would contend that its merits may overshadow its demerits.
Without a shadow of a doubt, the benefit of private funds can enhance the research and development process. The reason for this could be that it can create innovation and think creatively in specific fields. Moreover, the financial pressure on the state’s coffer can be relieved. For instance, the rapid development of mRNA vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna during the COVID-19 pandemic showed the efficiency and potential innovation of private companies, this case was groundbreaking in that harsh time. Therefore, private sponsors contribute numerous advantages to scientific research.
While the redeeming features of the private companies' funding are widely acknowledged, their counterparts still linger. Private entities are more predisposed to financial incentives since they are primarily driven to boost their profits. This could probably be because they may not always prioritize research that benefits the public good such as environmental sustainability if it doesn’t align with their profit goals. To be more specific, a private medical firm in Ghana conducted research and produced over 6 hundred thousand doses of COVID-19 vaccine that did not meet WHO standards, this means they do this to maximize their profits. Thus, private funding for research and development can also bring some drawbacks.
In conclusion, I would claim that although private companies invest and conduct more scientific research than the government, which brings abundant advantages, however, its counterparts still exist.
There is an argumentative phenomenon that in today's world, most scientific studies are not funded and carried out by high-ranking bureaucrats, but private enterprises. This reality has both merits and demerits, however its redeeming features can not outweigh its counterparts.
Without a shadow of a doubt, the world needs well-established firms to carry out scientific research. It is due to the fact that those reputed companies can pour their huge cash flow into hiring numerous talented experts to conduct helpful experiments. For instance, Vingroup which is a nationally acclaimed business run by Pham Nhat Vuong has allocated big investments in specific vaccines to deal with highly contagious COVID-19. Hence, private corporations may bring great contributions to far-reaching scientific research.
While the redeeming features of the mentioned phenomenon are widely acknowledged, its downsides still linger. To be more precise, because governments are not involved in the transparency and effectiveness of private institutions’ products, those with profitable purposes may be dangerous to consumers. For example, drug companies may cut costs to become as lucrative as they can, therefore lower quality items may be manufactured to become an unuseful placebo or medicines with lethal side effects. Therefore, there are worries about the safety of products without any state’s authenticity.
In conclusion, acclaimed private firms have a comparatively great positive influence on academic research, however, there is likely a chance for those with bad purposes to do harm to our society. Thus, governments should participate in more steps to test and modify the products to gain more trust from consumers.
Nowadays, personal firms instead of the authorities spend on and lead most scientific research. Personally, I believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, today, a majority number of scientific research has been invested in and led by confidential corporations rather than the government. This brings several benefits to society, such as helping the authorities save public funds for other social issues like buying equipment for disabled people, providing accommodations for homeless individuals, bringing up orphans and much more, which contributes to building happy communities full of affection. Additionally, profit-marking companies are able to pay a high salary for talented human resources as well as a better working environment for them to develop scientific research the most effectively. For example, in my country, Vietnam, private companies always give a prospect salary. Besides, provides the most modern equipment to attract talented people . Thus, more talented individuals tend to priority to work at personal companies. Consequently, the great achievements of scientific studies usually belong to personal businesses
On the other hand, it is clear that private businesses instead of the government allocate funds for and accompany most scientific studies, which causes some disadvantages, such as the higher cost of the productions made from the successes of the scientific research of personal firms because of their financial purposes. To illustrate, in my country, there are many dietary supplements which are good for healthy humans but are more expensive than their value because profit-making companies own their exclusive technology and they go up in prices in aim to earn more money. Therefore, only the rich can use it. As a result, this will lead to people's limited experience because of purpose income. Moreover, it contributes to increasing the gap in society.
In the contemporary era, the majority of scientific research is financed and conducted by private enterprises, rather than being solely under the purview of government institutions. In my view, the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages.
On the positive side, it is undeniable that this shift has brought about several benefits for society and the private sector. One of the significant advantages is the potential cost savings for the government. As private companies undertake research to develop new products and technologies to remain competitive in the market, the government is relieved from the burden of allocating public funds for scientific endeavors. Consequently, society reaps the rewards of various advancements in diverse fields, including but not limited to, annual releases of innovative smartphones, novel marketing strategies, and breakthroughs in areas such as artificial intelligence. Furthermore, due to the profit-driven nature of these companies, there is a strong incentive to conduct research and studies more efficiently with minimal resources, thus maximizing their productivity.
Conversely, there are substantial drawbacks associated with the dominance of private entities in scientific research. Notably, their profit-oriented approach raises concerns about public safety, as companies may exploit research findings for commercial gain without giving due consideration to potential risks. This can manifest in the form of exorbitant pricing of new products, or the misuse of research outcomes, such as the unauthorized sale of innovative drugs to illicit groups. Additionally, the scarcity of companies engaged in scientific research, coupled with the high costs involved, often leads to inflated prices for the end consumers, thereby limiting public access to beneficial innovations.
In conclusion, while it is evident that private sector involvement in scientific research has its merits, the downsides cannot be disregarded. Therefore, it is imperative for governments to bolster their oversight and regulatory mechanisms to ensure the safety and ethical use of research outcomes, particularly in sensitive domains like national defense, security, and public health.
Xem thêm các tài liệu Tiếng Anh hay, chi tiết khác:
TOP việc làm "HOT" dành cho sinh viên:
Đăng nhập để có thể bình luận
Nếu bạn đang tìm cách nâng trình tiếng Anh thú vị hơn thay vì học theo cách truyền thống, việc học qua phim ảnh và video có thể là lựa chọn lý tưởng. Cùng 1900.com.vn khám phá Top 13 website học tiếng Anh qua phim ảnh & video online chất lượng hiện nay — giúp bạn vừa giải trí vừa tiến bộ, nâng cao khả năng nghe nói và phản xạ tự nhiên hơn.
1900.com.vn tổng hợp bài viết về Câu điều kiện loại 1 (First Conditional) đầy đủ các kiến thức bao gồm: Định nghĩa, cấu trúc ngữ pháp, cách dùng, các ví dụ minh họa và bài tập vận dụng. Từ đó giúp bạn nắm vững kiến thức và học tốt Tiếng Anh hơn.
1900.com.vn tổng hợp bài viết về Speaking Forecast 2023 | Bộ đề dự đoán chi tiết mới nhất cung cấp cho người học một loạt các chủ đề, câu hỏi và phương pháp luyện tập để giúp họ nâng cao khả năng giao tiếp tiếng Anh của mình. Từ đó giúp bạn nắm vững kiến thức và học tốt Tiếng Anh hơn.