Topic: Tourism - Đề bài, bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 và Từ vựng
Đề bài IELTS Writing Task 2 Tourism: Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment?
Phân tích
Introduction: Paraphrase lại đề bài
Thesis statement (giới thiệu nội dung chính của toàn bài): Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi của đề bài.
Body 1: Lợi ích của các tour du lịch đến vùng sâu vùng xa đối với người bản địa
1st idea: Khách du lịch có nhu cầu mua và sử dụng dịch vụ + sẵn sàng trả giá cao hơn bình thường.
Support: Khuyến khích kinh tế địa phương + nâng cao mức sống của người dân.
2nd idea: Khách du lịch mang tới cho người dân nhiều trải nghiệm và kiến thức mới.
Support:Người dân vùng sâu vùng xa thường bị cô lập với thế giới bên ngoài → việc giao tiếp và tương tác với du khách sẽ giúp người dân có hiểu biết thêm về xã hội văn minh.
Body 2: Ảnh hưởng tiêu cực của các tour du lịch này đến môi trường
1st idea: Du khách xả rác và không dọn dẹp những thứ họ xả ra tại các khu vực họ tới.
Support: Gây nên các ảnh hưởng xấu đến môi trường sống của người dân (đường bẩn, hệ thống nước thải tắc nghẽn, v.v.)
2nd idea: Người dân địa phương hi sinh các tài nguyên thiên nhiên để tạo các sản phẩm cho khách du lịch.
Support:Người dân chặt phá rừng để làm các sản phẩm bán cho khác du lịch và làm một số hành động tổn hại môi trường khác.
Trước khi tham khảo bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Tourism, hãy cùng 1900 điểm qua một số phân tích đề thi cũng như outline chi tiết được biên soạn bởi giáo viên hạng A nhé!
1. Phân tích đề thi
IELTS Writing Task 2 Tourism là đề thi có độ khó ở mức trung bình. Mặc dù thí sinh có thể không gặp nhiều khó khăn khi tìm ý tưởng, nhưng vẫn cần để ý đến cạm bẫy cần tránh để đạt điểm cao, như:
2. Dàn bài chi tiết
Dàn bài IELTS Writing Task 2 Tourism bao gồm 4 phần, cụ thể nội dung chính được trình bày như trong bảng dưới đây:
| Introduction |
|
| Negatives of organized tours to remote areas and communities |
|
| Positives of organized tours to remote areas and communities |
|
| Conclusion & Opinion |
|
With the improvement of tourism and globalisation, most tourism agencies are organizing tours to the countryside these days. Some people believe that this tourism activity helps to develop in rural areas opportunities which locals have, while others think that the reverse is true. This has some positive impacts on the local people, but I think the detrimental effects on the environment are more significant and that the issue is more of a negative development.
First of all, the environment in the countryside hosts various kinds of animals, such as birds, fish etc. According to scientific reports, many types of fish are affected in a negative way during the tourism season. For example, the population of salmon in the ocean dramatically decreased, after the number of tours increased in Iceland. Thus, tourists should care for and respect the life condition of local and endangered species of animals.
In regard to, people who live in rural areas have limited chances about their life conditions. For instance, the amount of food depends on the weather condition, additionally, after a hard winter season the amount of harvested crops is just enough only local peoples eating habits. During the tour season, locals couldn't answer the demand of tourists. Because of this, tourism agencies ought to access fresh information about local life.
So, to sum up, it is clear to say that, tourism is one the most important income sources for the locals. However, especially in dangered situations, the government and locals should cooperate together to protect their natural environment. I think that the negative environmental consequences that this situation brings are far more significant.
In the modern era, the issue of local tour has become highly controversial. There are those who say that the local tour is negative for countryside people and the environment however, others believe that it should not. In this essay, i will examine both sides arguments and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons why people believe that government municipalities should prevent to tour in the national place. Perhaps there are the main reason why people are in favor of this phenomenon is that these days, many national place was opened than that was destroyed because of the visitor. Some people visit the tour area and they do not pick up their trash. This situation leads to destroy the environment. A further point in favour of tour in the local place, if local place develops to tour location, people can get noise pollution from visitor. In addition, their site will be changed to trash and noisy place like shopper market.
Despite, these challenges, there are several arguments against this. Firstly, the are developing about tour location, people who live in national place will get more profits. For example, visitor come in to the area than they eat some food, hang out in the place and found local food or gift.
In conclusion, it is clear this is a topic which very relevant to modern society. Some point will better for local people, however, this situation will keep going than the environment will destroyed. National place is very important to people. In addition, people will must keep our local area.
It is true that the number of tourists travelling to regional sites is growing currently. However, as any phenomena that occur in the world, this trend brings both positive and negative consequences to not only local inhabitants but also to their surrounding environment.
On the positive side, the increase in tourism creates more employment opportunities for the local workforce. It triggers more investors to construct their hotels, retail branches or other tourist service providers in these destinations so that local residents do not have to migrate to the big cities to seek better jobs. These regional dwellers can also boost their household income by establishing their own shops or restaurants selling local specialities such as souvenirs or traditional cuisines. Therefore, the quality of their lives can be improved significantly. Furthermore, in order to attract more wildlife explorers, awareness of protecting the area’s biodiversity among the public and local authorities has to be boosted simultaneously. More regulations and laws related to preserving endangered species may be passed and enhanced sooner, thus, the local environment can be conserved more effectively.
On the negative side, it is undeniable that tourism can disturb the normal peaceful life of regional residents and creatures. For example, some visitors lacking cultural knowledge relating to their destinations could unintentionally do some inappropriate behaviours which accidentally insult the local people, their customs or beliefs. Consequently, these local people can be put into unnecessary conflict with travellers making their relationship become tenser. In terms of the environment, more tourists also mean more trash. If tourists ignorantly dispose of their plastic garbage even small pieces of bags or containers directly into the seashore or water, the environment of this place will be polluted severely, because as we know, plastic is a non-recyclable material and can take almost centuries to be totally decomposed.
In conclusion, encouraging more travellers to visit regional destinations can bring back both advantages and disadvantages to local society. It can influence various fields of these places ranging from their economy, their pace of lives as well as their natural habitat.
The growing popularity of organized tours to remote areas and communities has sparked debate over its impact. This essay will explore whether this trend is a positive or negative development for local people and the environment.
On the one hand, organized tours can bring significant benefits to remote communities. Tourism often provides a vital source of income for local people, creating jobs and stimulating economic growth in areas that might otherwise have limited opportunities. For example, locals may find employment as tour guides, in hospitality, or by selling handmade crafts to tourists. Additionally, exposure to tourists can lead to the preservation and sharing of cultural heritage, as visitors are often eager to learn about the customs and traditions of the communities they visit. In some cases, tourism revenue can also be reinvested into community development projects, improving infrastructure and access to essential services.
On the other hand, there are concerns about the negative impacts of organized tours on both the environment and local cultures. The influx of tourists can put a strain on natural resources, leading to environmental degradation. For instance, increased foot traffic in fragile ecosystems can damage vegetation and wildlife habitats, while the construction of tourist facilities may lead to deforestation and pollution. Moreover, the commercialization of local cultures to cater to tourists can result in the loss of authenticity, as traditions may be altered or exaggerated to meet tourist expectations. This can lead to cultural erosion and a decline in the community’s sense of identity.
In conclusion, while organized tours to remote areas can bring economic and cultural benefits to local communities, they also pose significant risks to the environment and cultural integrity. It is essential to manage tourism responsibly to ensure that its positive impacts are maximized while minimizing potential harm. With careful planning and regulation, the development of tourism in these areas can be a positive force for both people and the environment.
Organized tours to distant locations and communities have become popular in recent years. In the debate about the impacts of such tours on the local people and the environment, I believe that this development is largely beneficial.
On the one hand, there are some disadvantages produced by this kind of traveling. Firstly, the influx of tourists, especially those who lack environmental awareness, may harm the environment. These heedless visitors may litter indiscriminately because of the lack of waste disposal facilities. The waste would cause pollution, especially if dumped in water sources, and damage the natural beauty as well. The presence of tourists, in addition, can lead to local people being exploited. Tour operators who are looking to make a profit may take advantage of indigenous communities and market them as attractions to travelers. In some cases, the natives receive little to no compensation for their trouble. It is hence understandable that some would express reservations toward the idea of touring to remote areas and communities.
However, significant benefits to the local people and the environment do exist. Organized tours can raise awareness of environmental protection in visitors. The fascination with the exotic or breathtaking scenery at the destination might spur people to preserve nature. Consequently, there would be an increase in protection and conservation efforts for the area. Being visited by tourists, meanwhile, may help the natives catch up in terms of human development. As these indigenous communities are far away from civilization, contact with organized tours offers them an interesting cultural exchange and economic opportunities. Specifically, they can offer services, such as accommodation, food, and transport, to the tourists for income in return. At the same time, this experience lets them learn about the world through visitors, helping to broaden their horizons and perspective so that they could improve their communities later on.
Given these points, I believe that organized tours to remote locations represent a positive development, despite some misgivings. It is therefore crucial that tour agencies operate ethically to protect both the natives and the environment from exploitation. By doing so, the benefits of organized tours can be maximized, while minimizing the detrimental impacts.
Từ vựng sử dụng trong bài IELTS Writing Task 2 Tourism:
In recent years, there has been a growing tendency for tourists to travel to remote locations and communities on organised tours. This has some positive impacts on the local people, but I think the detrimental effects on the environment are more significant and that the issue is more of a negative development.
The financial and socio-cultural benefits for the locals in remote areas are evident. Tourists visiting these regions have a high demand for goods and services, and are mostly willing to pay higher than average prices. This helps to boost local economies in remote areas and eventually enhance living standards of the local people. Regarding the socio-cultural aspects, Travelers from different cultures can provide ethnic people in remote areas, who are almost completely isolated from the outside world, with a lot of experiences through their interactions with one another, which can help these local residents to broaden knowledge about a more civilized society.
However, the hordes of tourists to remote regions still leave severe impacts on the environment in these areas. In fact, tourists often litter where ever they go and do not bother to clean after themselves in areas they have visited. This may lead to such conditions as dirty roads or clogged sewage systems in these places, which negatively and directly affects local people’s living conditions. In terms of indirect effects, I believe that the indigenous people have to sacrifice their natural resources to accommodate tourists’ insatiable demands. In several mountainous areas of Vietnam, local people cut down vast areas of forest to make handicrafts or furniture for tourists. These acts can contribute to the environmental deterioration in remote areas.
In conclusion, though the economy and societies in remote areas can benefit tremendously from organised tourism, I think that the negative environmental consequences that this situation brings are far more significant.
Từ vựng
Xem thêm các tài liệu Tiếng Anh hay, chi tiết khác:
TOP Việc làm "HOT" dành cho sinh viên:
Đăng nhập để có thể bình luận
1900.com.vn tổng hợp bài viết về Describe an object that you think is beautiful - Bài mẫu IELTS Speaking Part 2,3 giúp bạn nắm vững kiến thức và đạt điểm cao trong bài thi Tiếng Anh.
1900.com.vn tổng hợp bài viết về The salaries of secondary teachers in five countries - Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 1 giúp bạn nắm vững kiến thức và đạt điểm cao trong bài thi Tiếng Anh.
1900.com.vn tổng hợp bài viết về Types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 | Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 1 giúp bạn nắm vững kiến thức và đạt điểm cao trong bài thi Tiếng Anh.