Topic: Food Demand - Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Band 8.0+
1900.com.vn tổng hợp bài viết về Topic: Food Demand - Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Band 8.0+ . Từ đó giúp bạn nắm vững kiến thức và học tốt Tiếng Anh hơn.
Topic: Children - Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Band 8.0+
1. Phân tích đề bài
Đề bài:
Some people believe that children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe that children should be free to do what they want to do in their free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Một số người tin rằng trẻ em nên thực hiện các hoạt động có tổ chức trong thời gian rảnh rỗi trong khi những người khác tin rằng trẻ em nên được tự do làm những gì chúng muốn làm trong thời gian rảnh rỗi. Thảo luận về cả hai quan điểm và đưa ra ý kiến của bạn.
Tại đây ta có thể thấy đề bài đưa ra vấn đề về việc trẻ em nên làm gì trong thời gian rảnh. Đề bài yêu cầu bạn thảo luận về hai phía và đưa ra ý kiến riêng.
=> Đề bài này thuộc dạng bài Discussion.
2. Dàn ý
Introduction:
=> Some people believe that children should engage in organized activities during their free time, while others argue that children should have the freedom to choose what they do.
=> In my opinion, while organized activities can be beneficial for children, it is important to strike a balance between structured and unstructured free time.
Body 1: Để trẻ em tham gia các hoạt động có tổ chức
=> Provide structure and discipline => help children develop important life skills.
=> Provide a sense of community and belonging => particularly important for children who may struggle to find a sense of belonging elsewhere.
Body 2: Để trẻ tự do chọn hoạt động:
=> Forcing children to participate in organized activities can be stressful => lead to burnout, particularly if the child is not interested in the activity.
=> Children who are allowed to choose their own activities may be more likely to discover and pursue their passions.
Conclusion:
=> In conclusion, the debate over how children should spend their free time is a complex issue, and there are valid arguments on both sides.
With an ever-increasing concern about how to handle the boundaries between free will and guidance on children, some individuals have opined that free-time activities for children should be guided by parents. The rest of the population, however, argues that children should do what they want in their free time. This essay will, therefore, evaluate both arguments and present a concluding viewpoint.
To begin with, some individuals argue that parents should organize free time activities for children. From the perspective of parents, their children are suffering from the lack of information and knowledge in acquiring safety in free time activities. Therefore, they will actually be benefited from following the guidance of parents as it will equip them with an essential safe environment.
Furthermore, compared to random groups of children without the given trend, those children with a rising freewill to choose and engage in free time activities have shown an increased tendency of being injured and decreased psychological satisfaction of parents.
In spite of those reasons mentioned above, other oppositions contend that children should play with their free will in their free time. Providing a few agreements on previous arguments, moving to educational instructors can illuminate a different perspective. The priority of them is to maximize the inner potential of students and teach active learning attitudes for their future and this consequently demonstrates that children require the opportunities to make choices with their free will and the necessity to overcome passive learning attitudes. Thus, making decisions about considering about boundaries for children should not be based on the sole side of parents. Moreover, there must be other factors to be weighed in appreciating the actual causal relationship between the free will of children and free time activities.
In conclusion, some individuals argue that parents should provide organized free time activities for children. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that making decisions in boundaries of free will of children more achievable will require more consideration and thus most relevant parties in society should be entirely involved for more sustainable advantages.
Nowadays, psychologists are keen to raise the awareness of parents about the importance of leisure time for children. They indicate that activities kids are involved in should be monitored and tailored according to their personalities and needs as well, However, some consider that any activity ought to be as they choose not as parents wish. This essay will discuss both points of view and my personal opinion will be presented in the upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with the first opinion, which I agree with, it is better for free time to be useful to enhance the interpersonal skills of youngsters or to improve a hobby. In other words, they will get the most out of playing time. For example, Kidzania, which is a worldwide popular playing center, is considered by experts as the best creative and entertainment place where children can play and learn at the same time. Besides that, in such experience, they are given the chance to discover more about their interests and abilities. Furthermore, they socialize and cooperate with others and make new friends.
On the other side, Some opine that a child's life is guided by caretakers around the clock. Hence, giving them a space of freedom to do whatever they wish is important to feel that they are responsible and have privacy. this group of people argue that some may tend to force their kids to practice something they could not do when they were young such as playing the piano or taking riding horses lessons, which their son/daughter dislikes or is not interested in. By this, the effects will be deteriorating on their personalities and they could be under stress instead of having fun and entertaining.
to conclude, the aforementioned points clearly explain how I agree with organising the free play time. However, on balance, youngsters should be allowed to select things they like to do but within limitations because if they were given unlimited choices they would certainly tend to play video games and virtual activities which would not encounter sedentary lifestyle.
Although some individuals believe that children should be free to choose the way to spend their leisure time because it is beneficial to their personality, I fully agree that parents should select the activities that their children do in their free time due to their experiences and maturity.
On the one hand, those who support the idea of children’s freedom believe that it is the best way to strengthen their personalities. For instance, when you give children the initiative to select what they prefer to consume as hobbies, their confidence and self-esteem will rise as a consequence as their brains receive those actions as a sign of maturity and awarness moreover they will build responsible and strong personalities .I remark this type in my sister who usually makes every decision bon her own .
On the other hand, children's free time activities must be controlled by parents. Kids due to their lack of experience, they can get into harmful things. Such as drugs and alcohol, without realizing it's dangerous. So parents with their knowledge, can select convenient activities that combine with enjoyment and learning. Recent research conducted in London shows that about 90% of drug addicts have started their addictions at the age between 12 and 20.
In conclusion, while various people think that giving the son or the daughter the responsibility to choose the way to spend their relaxing time is the best way to enhance their autonomy, I assume that mothers and fathers have to manage the activities that their children affect in their free time to ensure their safety and to protect them.
In today’s society, some believe that parents should arrange activities for their children during their leisure time, while others contend that allowing children to choose the activities they want to do is more crucial. This question has become a matter of considerable debate. Therefore, this essay will explore both viewpoints, and I believe that children should have the freedom to choose the activities they are interested in.
On the one hand, advocates of having parents arrange activities argue that, due to their extensive life experience and knowledge, parents can select beneficial and wise activities for their children, such as piano classes, swimming lessons, and language courses—all of which contribute to developing children’s overall abilities. This, in turn, not only helps them learn a wide range of useful skills but also paves the way for their future. As a result, organising well-informed engagements by parents brings about numerous benefits.
On the other hand, proponents of empowering children to choose their own leisure activities assert that prioritising children’s hobbies and interests offers more advantages. For instance, if children are passionate about dance, engaging in dancing activities enhances their sense of satisfaction and improves their confidence, thereby boosting their overall well-being. Furthermore, allowing children to freely select activities can help them discover their talents, which may open more doors for education and job opportunities in the long run.
For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that having parents arrange activities can result in some benefits, while allowing children to choose their own activities brings about more positive impacts, such as improved well-being, increased satisfaction, and talent development. Consequently, this approach leads to more beneficial effects for children.
Some people believe that children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe that children should be free to do what they want to do in their free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The topic of how children should spend their free time is a contentious issue. Some people believe that children should engage in organized activities during their free time, while others argue that children should have the freedom to choose what they do. In my opinion, while organized activities can be beneficial for children, it is important to strike a balance between structured and unstructured free time.
On the one hand, doing organized activities during free time provide structure and discipline, and help children develop important life skills. For example, participation in sports or music lessons can help children to develop teamwork, leadership, and time management skills, while also promoting physical and mental health. Additionally, organized activities can provide a sense of community and belonging, which can be particularly important for children who may struggle to find a sense of belonging elsewhere.
On the other hand, children also should have the freedom to choose how they spend their free time. Forcing children to participate in organized activities can be stressful and can lead to burnout, particularly if the child is not interested in the activity. For example, imagine a child who is forced to participate in a soccer team. If the child finds the practices and games to be tedious and stressful, this will lead to burnout and frustration. Furthermore, children who are allowed to choose their own activities may be more likely to discover and pursue their passions, leading to a more fulfilling and meaningful life.
In conclusion, the debate over how children should spend their free time is a complex issue, and there are valid arguments on both sides. While organized activities can provide important benefits, it is important to also allow children the freedom to explore and pursue their own interests.
Bài dịch:
Chủ đề về cách trẻ em nên sử dụng thời gian rảnh là một vấn đề gây tranh cãi. Một số người tin rằng trẻ em nên tham gia vào các hoạt động có tổ chức trong thời gian rảnh rỗi, trong khi những người khác cho rằng trẻ em nên có quyền tự do lựa chọn những gì chúng làm. Theo tôi, trong khi các hoạt động có tổ chức có thể có lợi cho trẻ em, thì điều quan trọng là phải đạt được sự cân bằng giữa thời gian rảnh rỗi có cấu trúc và không có cấu trúc.
Một mặt, thực hiện các hoạt động có tổ chức trong thời gian rảnh cung cấp cấu trúc và kỷ luật, đồng thời giúp trẻ phát triển các kỹ năng sống quan trọng. Ví dụ, tham gia các lớp học thể thao hoặc âm nhạc có thể giúp trẻ phát triển kỹ năng làm việc nhóm, lãnh đạo và quản lý thời gian, đồng thời tăng cường sức khỏe thể chất và tinh thần. Ngoài ra, các hoạt động có tổ chức có thể mang lại cảm giác cộng đồng và cảm giác được làm một phần nào đó, điều này có thể đặc biệt quan trọng đối với trẻ em đang gặp khó khăn trong việc tìm kiếm cảm giác thân thuộc ở nơi khác.
Mặt khác, trẻ em cũng nên có quyền tự do lựa chọn cách chúng sử dụng thời gian rảnh rỗi. Buộc trẻ tham gia vào các hoạt động có tổ chức có thể gây căng thẳng và có thể dẫn đến kiệt sức, đặc biệt nếu trẻ không hứng thú với hoạt động đó. Ví dụ, hãy tưởng tượng một đứa trẻ bị buộc phải tham gia vào một đội bóng đá. Nếu đứa trẻ thấy các bài tập và trò chơi tẻ nhạt và căng thẳng, dẫn đến kiệt sức và khó chịu. Hơn nữa, những đứa trẻ được phép lựa chọn các hoạt động của riêng mình có thể có nhiều khả năng khám phá và theo đuổi đam mê của mình hơn, dẫn đến một cuộc sống trọn vẹn và ý nghĩa hơn.
Tóm lại, cuộc tranh luận về việc trẻ em nên sử dụng thời gian rảnh như thế nào là một vấn đề phức tạp và có những lập luận xác đáng từ cả hai phía. Mặc dù các hoạt động có tổ chức có thể mang lại những lợi ích quan trọng, nhưng điều quan trọng là cũng phải cho phép trẻ em tự do khám phá và theo đuổi sở thích của riêng mình.
Xem thêm các tài liệu Tiếng Anh hay, chi tiết khác:
TOP Việc làm "HOT" dành cho sinh viên:
Đăng nhập để có thể bình luận