Best Way to Reduce Poverty in Developing Countries is by Giving up to Six years of Free Education - Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2
Introduction
Sentences 1&2 – It is commonly suggested that ensuring primary school education remains free would expand access to education. Some have proposed that this would be a particularly effectual solution to poverty.
Sentence 3 – I completely agree with this suggestion and in the subsequent paragraphs, I will delineate why the guaranteed provision of free primary education will alleviate poverty.
Body paragraphs
Paragraph 1 – Free education would curtail drop-out rates.
Paragraph 2 – Free education would help people to pick up skills which would get them better jobs.
Paragraph 3- However, providing free education would increase taxation, adding to poverty rather than solving it.
Sample Essay
Bài mẫu band 5.0+
Poverty is the most common problem in many developing nations. Offering free primary education is believed to be the best way to solve this problem, so that people can improve their reading, writing and numbering skills. I strongly disagree with the aforementioned statement because of its various drawbacks. This essay will discuss the reason for my differences.
To begin with, the first and foremost reason is that only free schooling is not effective enough to develop the country. Although education can provide people with wisdom and knowledge, the development of society takes a long process. Many poor people will not see these long-term benefits and want to be provided with the basic necessities. For instance, their priority is some aspects like food, shelter and clothes. Thus, instead of joining in free tuition, many people like to do some manual labor to make a living.
Furthermore, the government has to spend a large sum of money to provide free education. In fact, these developing countries can not afford to provide free tuition for about 6 years for all people. They have to raise the taxes of other citizens or take money from other areas to make up for it. This may add to poverty rather than solve it, and even restrain the development of society.
To conclude then, no doubt, education has its own importance to raise the country's economy, but the government still has to consider the aspirations of the poor and the amount of money they can spend. Therefore, the modernisation of existing professions and creating more job opportunities would be more impressive to combat poverty.
Bài mẫu band 5.5+
More developing nations are facing a range of problems and bankruptcy is the most important issue for them. One of the important solutions to decrease bankruptcy is providing free training for some years. I agree with that subject and in the upcoming paragraphs, i shall discuss my point of view in detail.
The poverty circle in some countries cannot be broken due to the lack of free learning. Their government should be giving up free supplies to low-income classes, to have an occasion to learn and study. With those facilities, the poor or needy community can improve their literacy level and get higher income through educational degrees. Therefore, the government in the developing society, by investing in education, in addition to training the specialized human resources needed for development programs, can also prepare the preparations for reducing indigence classes.
Furthermore, education is the key to improving the economy of these countries. People in developing nations need knowledge and skills and this target can be achieved just by getting better the quality of society's learning and literacy. Providing free teaching helps children in developing countries gain basic literacy and numeracy skills, which are essential for personal and professional development. Educated individuals are more likely to participate in civic activities and contribute positively to their communities, leading to social stability and cohesion. Also, culture often leads to better health awareness and practices, reducing healthcare costs and improving overall quality of life.
In conclusion, providing free learning for public causes poverty to decrease and the quality of life in developing nations will increase.
Bài mẫu band 6.0+
In recent times, people have argued that developing countries should provide six years of free education to reduce poverty. partly agree with this point of view.
First and foremost, we should recognize that free education for at least six years is important to build children's basic knowledge and necessary skills. There is no denying that it is a vital opportunity for them to be equipped with a variety of skills, such as reading, writing, and using numbers. It is also the foundation for them to access higher academic education. One other justification is that free education makes education more accessible. Families having financial burdens will be able to afford their children's tuition fees. Free education even provides more opportunities for girls to attend school, which not only breaks the cycle of poverty but also solves the problem of gender equality.
On the other hand, there are several reasons against the statement. Primary education might not provide practical knowledge and skills, especially in an industrial and modern society. For instance, many jobs require applicants to have secondary and higher academic levels degrees and computer skills. In addition, free education requires financial support from the government. That leads to an increase in tax rates, which might affect individuals' savings and economic growth.
In conclusion, I partly support giving up to six years of free education. However, I believe that we should consider this issue carefully before making a final decision.
Bài mẫu band 6.5+
A controversial perspective is heating up a debate over the fact that providing six years of free education is the most effective way to reduce poverty in developing countries, as it enables impoverished individuals to achieve basic literacy and numeracy skills. I do not deem myself as an advocate of this idea.
It is clear to note that investing in free education for individuals lacking literacy and numeracy skills can
significantly reduce poverty rates. This is due to today's job market requiring employees to have basic knowledge. For example, majors such as business and accounting require basic computing abilities. Therefore, having a 6-year free education policy is highly effective in reducing poverty in developing countries, which allows people from disadvantaged backgrounds to have better and higher paying job opportunities.
Although six years of free schooling plays a significant role in alleviating poverty, vocational training has the potential to make an even greater impact. Providing practical skills through vocational education can significantly enhance the earning potential of individuals living in poverty. For instance, recent initiatives by the government have introduced free training programs in various trades such as cooking, repair work, and other practical fields. These programs are designed to help individuals acquire the specific skills needed to meet job requirements, even with minimal formal education. As a result, vocational training not only improves job prospects but also enables individuals to secure stable employment, thereby better supporting their families financially and contributing to a more sustainable reduction in poverty.
In summary, although six years of free education for those lacking literacy and numeracy is a starting point for decreasing poverty, vocational training can offer even greater advantages and further reduce poverty.
Bài mẫu band 8.0+
Given the ongoing poverty in underdeveloped countries, a multitude of individuals maintain that the most optimal solution is to provide children a 6-year education free of charge to eradicate illiteracy and improve numeracy. I find myself largely in agreement with this proposition as free education can equip them with foundational skills and liberate their mindset; however, it is essential to incorporate other solutions to form a comprehensive plan.
The foremost rationale for my endorsement of free-of-charge early education as the best solution is that it provides all children in developing countries, regardless of their family background, fundamental academic skills which include the ability to read, write and perform basic maths. These foundational skills would form a concrete basis for these children to thrive in the pursuit of knowledge, acquiring desirable degrees which vastly increase the chances of paid employment and a stable income in the future.
The second argument for why I support prioritising sponsoring tuition fees being the key to addressing poverty is the fact that school lessons allow children to escape from orthodox traditions. In the mountainous regions of Vietnam, these outdated traditions encompass early marriage, child labour and heavy drinking which are the underlying causes of underdevelopment. If all children were sent to free schools, they would be taught a more modern mindset, which celebrates liberation and personal growth, becoming independent individuals who can find their own way out of impoverishment.
Nevertheless, I acknowledge the importance of other approaches in an effort to support impoverished people. For instance, financial organisations should provide funding for upgrading infrastructure with better connected roads and bridges. These would not only foster economic growth but also cultural exchanges that enable sustainable development.
In conclusion, I mostly agree with the idea of offering 6 years of schooling free of charge with a view to ending poverty in developing nations as it makes it possible for young people to acquire basic knowledge and have a more liberal mindset even though additional initiatives such as infrastructure improvement should also be in place. That is why governments should develop a comprehensive plan to address the issue of poverty systematically.
Xem thêm các tài liệu Tiếng Anh hay, chi tiết khác:
TOP việc làm "HOT" dành cho sinh viên