Value of Preserving Old Buildings | Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 (2025)

1900.com.vn tổng hợp và giới thiệu bài viết Value of Preserving Old Buildings | Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 giúp bạn nắm vững cách làm bài, nâng cao vốn từ vựng và đạt kết quả cao trong bài thi Tiếng Anh.

Value of Preserving Old Buildings | Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2

Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 ngày 12/01/2023

Đề bài: Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?

Phân tích đề

  • Phạm vi chủ đề: Bảo tồn các tòa nhà lâu đời.
  • Nhiệm vụ: Nêu ra các loại tòa nhà lâu đời cần được bảo tồn. Đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân xem lợi ích của việc bảo tồn này có vượt trội hơn so với bất lợi hay không.
  • Định nghĩa các khái niệm có trong đề: old buildings - các tòa nhà lâu đời (bao gồm cả các tòa nhà cổ có nhiều giá trị về mặt kiến trúc hay lịch sử và cả các tòa nhà cũ).

Ý tưởng khác có thể sử dụng

Lợi ích của việc bảo tồn

Bất lợi của việc bảo tồn

  • Nhiều công trình có giá trị về mặt kiến trúc, với phong cách kiến trúc độc đáo.
  • Nhiều tòa nhà là nhân chứng lịch sử, chứa đựng các giá trị về mặt lịch sử, nhắc nhở mọi người về những sự kiện trong quá khứ.
  • Nhiều tòa nhà không có nhiều giá trị, thậm chí đã xuống cấp và gây nguy hiểm đến tính mạng con người. Việc bảo tồn các tòa nhà này là không cần thiết và lãng phí ngân sách.
  • Ngân sách quốc gia nên được dành cho những việc cấp bách và quan trọng hơn.

Bài mẫu tham khảo

It is believed by some people that efforts should be made to protect and preserve certain old buildings more so than others. Personally, I think there are definitely specific types of buildings that should be preserved, and that the advantages certainly outweigh the disadvantages.

Firstly, the types of old buildings that should be preserved include structures that hold a significant amount of historical and cultural value within a city or country. For example, important old government buildings, religious buildings such as old churches and temples, and even certain old monuments and structures. Furthermore, even buildings that simply help to define a certain era or aspect of culture through their style of architecture should be preserved in order to capture an aspect of history that can still be witnessed by people today. In doing so, not only are we able to better maintain a connection to our history and culture, but also add a significant amount of aesthetic quality to a city, which in turn, attracts tourism and attention from around the world. 

However, there are some disadvantages when it comes to preserving old buildings. For example, many older buildings require significant amounts of money to restore them to a structurally suitable condition. Additionally, most old buildings that tend to be preserved are no longer used for practical purposes other than preserving culture and adding value to the tourism industry of a country. Moreover, as towns and cities grow and space becomes limited, the preservation of old buildings can impede the progress of a city. However, I do believe that the importance of preserving culture in this manner is far more important than making way for new buildings and structures, and through tourism, a country can generate enough revenue to pay for the maintenance and restoration of such old buildings.

In conclusion, I believe that the importance of preserving culture and history through the preservation of certain old buildings is far more important than the progress they inhibit.

Dàn ý

1900 sẽ trình bày quan điểm qua 1 đoạn mở bài (introduction), 2 đoạn thân bài (body paragraph), và 1 đoạn kết bài (conclusion).

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, 1900 sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm: nên ưu tiên bảo tồn những tòa nhà có ý nghĩa lịch sử và văn hóa lớn nhất; bất lợi (chi phí sửa chữa và tác động đến nền kinh tế) nhiều hơn lợi ích

Thân bài:

  • Body 1:  phân tích lý do nên ưu tiên bảo tồn những tòa nhà có giá trị lịch sử và có đặc điểm độc đáo
  • Body 2:  phân tích 2 bất lợi của việc bảo tồn những tòa nhà cũ: tốn một chi phí khổng lồ + cản trở sự phát triển của nền kinh tế

Kết bài: Kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Bài mẫu

Preserving historic buildings is a contentious issue, with some arguing that certain buildings should be preserved more than others. I believe we should prioritize the preservation of buildings with the greatest cultural and historical significance. In addition, the drawbacks of keeping historic structures exceed their benefits slightly since preservation expenses and their effect on economic growth must be acknowledged.

Firstly, buildings with significant cultural or historical value should be preserved. This includes landmarks such as ancient temples, castles, and churches, which serve as a testament to a region's rich history and cultural heritage. Preserving such buildings helps to maintain a sense of continuity and connection to the past, providing a window into the history and culture of a community. Secondly, buildings with unique architectural features should also be preserved. These could include art deco buildings, Gothic-style churches, and Victorian mansions. Such buildings represent the pinnacle of design and architecture from their respective eras and remind them of the evolution of architectural styles over time.

However, preserving old buildings also has its drawbacks. Maintaining and preserving such buildings can be prohibitively expensive, and resources are often limited. This can divert resources away from other pressing needs, such as the construction of new infrastructure, affordable housing, and public services. Moreover, preserving old buildings can sometimes come at the cost of economic development. Preservation efforts may hinder economic growth by limiting land use and obstructing new development. This can lead to reduced job opportunities and economic prosperity for the region.

In conclusion, the most culturally and historically significant structures should be preserved first. Moreover, the expenses of preservation and its influence on economic growth must also be evaluated, and these factors marginally offset the benefits of keeping historic structures.

Bài mẫu band 5.0+

There is a belief about conservation of particular old structures is more important than others. For this essay, I am going to agree with this idea. I believe that these certain buildings are more important than others, and they should have the priority. Because they give people pleasure in different ways and, they are a kind of inspiration for some.

Some specific buildings are giving pleasure to people in different ways. Just looking at the architectural design of these structures might be a source of enjoyment for some. For example, I can sit and watch the dome of Blue Mosque for an hour, because the shape of dome and patterns on it are magnificent. I can see many different things every time I look at it. Furthermore, its complete structure is also fabulous, and I can look over for hours.

Moreover, these certain buildings are a kind of source of inspiration for some people. They are like humans about their lifespans, they born, get aged and die. This is why they inspire some people, they can survive from wars, natural disasters etc. The Great Wall of China is a great example for this situation, it is thousands of years old and got over many wars and natural disasters and stays still despite all these factors. This can be demonstrated for humans as building solid foundation helps you to survive many disasters in your life (Building a solid foundation can be demonstrated in humans as it helps them survive many disasters in life).

To conclude, it is more crucial that preservation of certain aged structures rather than other ones because they are kind of source of joy and inspire people in some ways.

Bài mẫu band 6.5+

It is proposed that a higher priority needs to be given to the preservation of particular ancient monuments compared to others. I fully support this assertion based on factors as valid as the level of historical and monetary values that they possess.

My firm belief that more attention should be paid to certain historical sites is attributed to several sound arguments, with the most reasonable one being much greater significance that  world-famous ones like Taj Mahal or Hagia Sophia carry, thus necessitating more attention and increased preservation. Historically, the former one has served as a symbol of pure affection and devotion while the latter has played a crucial part in Islamic world since the Ottoman Empire, promoting religious concepts of integrity, honest living, and faith. From an economic standpoint, these attractions of historical pride have a global appeal for tourists, bringing in higher visitor attendance and a great deal of revenue. This money, in turn, could be allocated to maintaining the heritage as well as attracting more visitors who would get to know about diverse cultures and stories behind the creation of great historic sites, ultimately promoting them to the world outside.

Furthermore, focusing on the large-scale conservation of all ancient structures seems all but impossible. Since such buildings are prone to wear out due to a wide range of factors, be it human-induced or natural as seen in the case of erosion of rocks because of acid rain, they command a huge source of income. This financial burden on the state budget proves problematic given other more important sectors which need government funding like healthcare, medicine, and education, consequently leading to improper or inadequate conservation initiatives  or even to the ignorance as a whole. This might take necessary attention away from protecting historical sites of greater value and leaving them unnoticed. Even worse is when it contributes to the loss of cultural heritage. That is why prioritizing quality over quantity - placing greater emphasis on the protection of particular ancient landmarks - is essential.

In conclusion, I completely advocate the notion of more attention paid to protect some physical structures of ancient significance based on the sensible arguments mentioned above.

Bài mẫu band 7.0+

Old building preservation has always been of great debate. Although some individuals believe in either demolishing or saving all kinds of decrepit buildings, I agree with the view that some cultural monuments are worth saving.

To begin with, cultural heritage is what individuals refer to as to foster a sense of identity. accordingly, there are numerous ways to keep these values over time as cultural richness presents itself in many parts of  society and region, historical construction being one of them. Consequently, preserving such constructions would contribute to saving traditional values and passing them down from generation to generation. For instance, anyone talking about Italy can think of the Pizza Bridge. It is obvious that destroying such magnificent and precious can have a negative impact on preserving the country's history.

However, not all of the old monuments are worth maintaining over time due to the unfruitfulness of the minority   . to clarify, some of these constructions are too destructed to be saved and due to their unacceptable approach, they are not many tourist attractions. Moreover, if societies exert to keep every decrepit structure alive, an enormous amount of resources is required to be dedicated to such maintenance projects. To cite an example, Britain governors once believed in  allocating the majority of their authority to save old monuments and after a decade they were faced with a considerable amount of financial conflicts.

To conclude, Although historical monuments are of great traditional value, we cannot exert to keep either all of them or none alive. As a result, I strongly agree that people should put adequate effort into saving some of them.

Bài mẫu band 7.5+

In recent times, there have been several debates about whether old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. In my perspective, I partly agree with this point of view.

First and foremost, people should recognize the fact that numerous old buildings hold significant historical value. It is obvious that a huge number of historic constructions reflect the way people live, work, and create their communities. Some of them even relate to historical events and now become the cultural identity of the cities in which they are located. Another justification that should not be ignored is that some old buildings can be considered as teaching tools. For instance, they could be transformed into museums and other tourist attractions. This not only boosts the cultural values of those constructions but also raises community sense.

On the other hand, there are some reasons that against the statement of preserving old buildings. It is vital to recognize that preserving those constructions requires a huge amount of money. This could become a financial burden for not only the owners and community but also financial support from the national budget. In other words, preserving and restoring those ancient buildings also limits land use in the city. There is a limitation in land that could be used to build new infrastructure and conduct other important city projects such as hospitals, schools, companies, or social housing. This might hinder the development of urban areas and modernization.

In conclusion, I partly support the statement of preserving old buildings. However, I believe that we should consider carefully before reaching the final decision.

Bài mẫu band 8.0+

Nowadays, governments and many people attempt to uphold historical buildings in order to increase their income. Some people believe that protecting historic buildings is more valuable than preserving the newest ones. It seems to me that rebuilding ancient relics is a worthwhile act and I will explain why in this essay.

Firstly, the renewal of old standing is a relevant solution to restore the chronicles and identity of the nations. It means that people could comprehend their ancestor achievements in this way and pride their identity extremely. For example, Persepolis located in Shiraz displays the power and glory of the Achaemenid empire capital, and Kurosh the first king of the Achaemenid dynasty established to rule is a well-known place in the world that Iranian people are proud of. A second factor is that historical structure could be a symbol of civilization and culture of the society that it can attach ancient generations to new ones. Therefore, memorable edifices could show life conditions in the past. For instance, the air pocket of structures in Yazd shows that people used to cool the air inside the houses by this method they adapt themselves to hot and dry weather. This leads us to the final and perhaps most significant element that protecting old buildings can have an intensive impact on countries' income by attracting tourists This means that if tourists visit these places, an economic boom will happen. For instance, Egypt can earn lots of money from its pyramids.

Indeed, some claim that renovating historical constructions costs a lot and is not affordable. Despite this, it seems that the preservation of aged buildings is a valuable investment for the countries.

  In conclusion, it seems maintaining ancient structures can help economic growth, by recognizing chronicles, and cultural symbols. Although protest pretense restoration has a sheer cost correct management of reconstruction costs will be lower.

Xem thêm các tài liệu Tiếng Anh hay, chi tiết khác:

TOP việc làm "HOT" dành cho sinh viên:

Bình luận (0)

Đăng nhập để có thể bình luận

Chưa có bình luận nào. Bạn hãy là người đầu tiên cho tôi biết ý kiến!
Nhắn tin Zalo